Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 So. 2d 1293 - Roberts v. State

482 So. 2d 1293 - Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Geohagan v. General Motors Corp. · Waters v. City of Birmingham · State v. Deddens · 431 So. 2d 534 - Dumas Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Southern Guar. Ins. Co. · Shelton v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 22, Title 15, or any other provision of law, with respect to any person who is found to have violated § 20-2-80 [now § 13A-2-231], adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence shall not be suspended, deferred, or withheld, nor shall such person be eligible for any type of parole, probation, work release, supervised intensive restitution program, release because of deduction from sentence for good behavior under corrections incentive time act....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The legislature obviously intended that all persons *Page 594 convicted of trafficking would receive a minimum mandatory sentence (unless they fall within the express exception set out in § 20-2-81(b)) and that the sentence would be served. Neither the trial courts nor the Pardons and Paroles Board has the power to reduce or suspend the mandated sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.