Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 So. 2d 239 - Barrett v. State

482 So. 2d 239 - Barrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Williams · 423 So. 2d 1333 - Copeland v. State · United States v. Diaz · Hemphill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was therefore error for the trial court to overrule appellant's motion for continuance and error not to direct the State to conduct a more thorough investigation as to the confidential informant's identity and whereabouts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 592 So. 2d 29 - Gowdy v. State
  2. “he did not know who she was or her whereabouts although he had written her name on a piece of paper but could not find it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 592 So. 2d 29 - Gowdy v. State
  3. “they did not know the confidential informant's whereabouts and did not have a file on her... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 592 So. 2d 29 - Gowdy v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.