Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 So. 2d 421 - Sparkman v. State

482 So. 2d 421 - Sparkman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Salvucci · 478 So. 2d 38 - Dean v. State · State v. Tsavaris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that the determination of whether the proponent of a motion to suppress is entitled to contest the legality of a search and seizure must take into consideration the substantive fourth amendment issues as well as the concept of standing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.