Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 SO2D 48 - State v. Vinson

State v. Vinson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Ross · Texas v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough the sentence imposed was the maximum allowed for the crime to which the defendant pled guilty, by plea bargaining the defendant obtained a significant reduction in the sentence he could have received.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the circumstances surrounding the signing of the consent form could indicate subtle coercion by the arresting agents, it is equally likely that the defendant could have concluded that it was in his best interest to cooperate. The record portrays the defendant as intelligent, streetwise, and articulate. After carefully reviewing the record, we find the defendant freely and voluntarily consented to the search of his house in order to secure certain advantages, concluding that it was in his best interest to cooperate with the law enforcement authorities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.