Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 SO2D 859 - Lambert Development Co. v. State

Lambert Development Co. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rockholt v. Keaty · The Research Group, Inc. v. Sharp · Esthay v. McCain · 348 So. 2d 1260 - State, Dept. of Highways v. Trichel · Esthay v. McCain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Entrances and exits from private properties adjacent to the rights-of-way of state highways may be regulated, prohibited, or abolished in the interest of the safety of the traveling public. The chief engineer of the Department of Transportation and Development, from time to time, shall prepare and promulgate descriptions and illustrations of various types and styles of entrances and exits consistent with this purpose and shall issue permits of necessity and convenience for the installation of entrances and exits in accordance with promulgated regulations and standards. The department may apply to the courts for such process as may be necessary to make the provisions of this Section effective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.