Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 SW2D 205 - Joines v. State

Joines v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably McKenzie v. State (1981), Carrillo v. State (1978)

28 state decisions

1501972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · Satillan v. State · Archer v. State · Coleman v. State · Van Bibber v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Two or more defendants who are jointly or separately ... indicted ... for the same offense ... may be, in the discretion of the court, tried jointly or separately as to one or more defendants; ... provided ... that in cases in which, upon timely motion to sever, and evidence introduced thereon, it is made known to the court that ... a joint trial would be prejudicial to any defendant, the court shall order a severance as to the defendant whose joint trial would prejudice the other defendant or defendants.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The record reflects that on April 19, 1971, the Hon. Frank H. Crain presided over the proceedings, which included hear- mgs on several motions, and the voir dire examination of the veniremen. On April 20, 1971, trial on the merits commenced, the Hon. Joe E. Kelly presiding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.