Bradshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hart v. State · Odom v. State · Feehery v. State · 157 Tex. Crim. 178 - Pollan v. State · Hochman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An essential element of the crime of receiving or the crime of concealing stolen property is knowledge on the part of the accused that the property received or concealed by him is stolen. See 5 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d, Section 2724, page 168. “In the present ease appellant was arrested while possessing without explanation recently stolen property. This alone is not sufficient to show that he knew it was stolen. Hochman v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 23 , 170 S.W.2d 756 . It is a circumstance which must be coupled with other significant circumstances to justify an inference of knowledge that the property was stolen. Pollan v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 178 , 247 S.W.2d 889 ; Grant v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 19 , 218 S.W. 1062 .””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cozby v. State · Pool v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.