Ex parte Melvin

¶1OPINION

¶2This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus hearing, remanding appellant to custody for extradition to the State of Alabama.

¶3The State introduced into evidence the Executive Warrant of the Governor of this State. The Warrant recites that the appellant stands charged by information and supporting affidavit before the proper authorities, with the crime of burglary and grand larceny.

¶4The Executive Warrant of the Governor of Texas, which appears regular on its face, made out a prima facie case authorizing remand of appellant to custody for extradition. Ex parte Jackson, Tex.Cr.App., 470 S.W.2d 679; Ex parte Rhodes, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 425; Ex parte Slavin, Tex.Cr.App., 461 S.W.2d 421.

¶5Appellant contends that he entered a plea of guilty to burglary and grand larceny in Alabama, and that the conviction was void “of the necessary procedures in accepting a plea of guilty.” 1

¶6*647The validity of a conviction in the State of Alabama is a question for the courts sitting in Alabama. Ex parte McCarthy, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 759; Ex parte Venable, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 86; Ex parte Knoll, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 174, 339 S.W.2d 678.

¶7No error has been shown. The order remanding appellant to custody for extradition is affirmed.

¶8No motion for rehearing will be filed by the clerk, except by leave of the court.

¶9Opinion approved by the Court.