Ex parte Wammack’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 162 Tex. Crim. 243 - Ex Parte Peairs · Ex Parte Posey · Ex Parte Binette · Orona v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another State shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing, alleging, * * * that the accused was present in the demanding State at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, and that thereafter he fled from the State, and accompanied by a copy of an indictment found or by information supported by affidavit in the State having jurisdiction of the crime, * * (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Dumas““We have concluded that the demand * * * does not require the affidavit * * * to be made before a magistrate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Dumas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.