Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 482 SW3D 58 - Buntion v. State

Buntion v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Wainwright v. Witt · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · In re Martin-Trigona · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there exists in the county where the prosecution is commenced so great a prejudice against him that he cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The facts of the offense alone may be sufficient to sustain the jury's finding of future dangerousness,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] jury may also infer a defendant's future dangerousness from evidence showing a lack of remorse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.