International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators v. United Contractors Ass'n’s Empirical Analysis
483 F.2d 384 · 1973
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1995 · most notably Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters (1983), Carpenters Local Union No of United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth Inc (1982)
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 17 (§ 6 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 102 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 52 (§ 20 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · United Mine Workers v. Pennington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“According to traditional theories of direct-indirect harm which have been applied by court decisions in order to limit the sweep of antitrust liability, the harm suffered by members of the Unions would be indirect, as they are adversely affected by the conspiracy directed against their employers, the non-Assoeiation contractors, not parties to the present suit. However, the “target” theory logically can encompass any claim of damage in the affected area. 27”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Nothing contained in the antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the existence and operation of labor, * * * organizations, instituted for the purposes of mutual help, * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the allegations (of unfair labor practices) are true, then such acts would not be immune”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Services, Inc., Seatrain Lines Inc., International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. McGrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp. Twin Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Service, Inc., International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. McGrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp · Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'n
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.