Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 F.2d 577 - Nations v. Morris

Nations v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

483 F.2d 577 · 1973

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Sun Ship, Inc. v. Pennsylvania (1980), Nations v. Morris (1973)

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

35019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 905 · 33 U.S.C. § 908 · 33 U.S.C. § 933 · 33 U.S.C. § 941 · 43 U.S.C. § 1331 (Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006) · 43 U.S.C. § 1333

Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki · Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “OCSLA, in its incorporation of [the LHWCA], did not speak in terms of injuries occurring on such platforms so as to distinguish them from those off the plat forms. The incorporation, § 1333(c), ... refers to ‘operations described in subsection (b)’ which thereby incorporates the broad scheme of § 1333(b). Obviously Congress purposefully established a system that would apply without regard to physical location.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any operations conducted on the outer Continental Shelf for the purpose of exploring for, developing, removing or transporting by pipeline the natural resources . . . of the subsoil and seabed of the outer Continental Shelf.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(f)or the purposes of the extension of the provisions of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act under this section (1) the term 'employee' does not include a master or member of a crew of any vessel . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.