Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission’s Empirical Analysis
483 F.2d 623 · 1973
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably United States v. Register (1974), Oklahoma Natural Gas Company Division of Oneok Inc v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1994)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 717
Relies on Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. · Federal Power Commission v. East Ohio Gas Co. · California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. · International Paper Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [I]t must be remembered that the FPC does not regulate the price of sales to direct customers such as large industries but only sales where ultimately the gas will be resold. [Emphasis supplied.] [Id. 483 F.2d at 626 .]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress did not intend the [Hinshaw Amendment] to relieve the Commission of jurisdiction over local branches of integrated interstate systems.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“within or at the boundary of a state if all of the gas so received is ultimately consumed within such state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.