Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 F.2d 943 - Delbert v. Mathis v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense

Delbert v. Mathis v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense’s Empirical Analysis

483 F.2d 943 · 1973

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
December 1991
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 1991 · most notably Beller v. Middendorf (1980), Cook v. Arentzen (1978)

11 federal appellate · 5 district ·

180197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on United States v. Augenblick · Carter v. Seamans · Gallagher v. United States · Julian R. McClendon v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mathis is seeking back pay and allowances from the date of his allegedly defective discharge to the present. He also seeks promotion to the grade he would have achieved had he suffered no adverse personnel action. Although his complaint is cast in terms of an action for mandamus and a declaratory judgment, the case is essentially one for a money judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.