Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 F.3d 258 - Campbell v. Galloway

Campbell v. Galloway’s Empirical Analysis

483 F.3d 258 · 2007

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Durham v. Jones (2013), Braun v. Maynard (2011)

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

390200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Garcetti v. Ceballos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Personal grievances, complaints about conditions of employment, or expressions about other matters of personal interest ... are matters more immediately concerned with the self-interest of the speaker as employee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from personal-capacity liability for civil damages under § 1983, insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.... A right is clearly established if the contours of the right are sufficiently clear so that a reasonable officer would have understood, un der the circumstances at hand, that his behavior violated the right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The concern of the immunity inquiry is to acknowledge that reasonable mistakes can be made as to the legal constraints on particular police conduct. It is sometimes difficult for an officer to determine how the relevant legal doctrine . . . will apply to the factual situation the officer confronts. . . . If the officer's mistake as to what the law requires is reasonable, however, the officer is entitled to the immunity defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.