Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 F.3d 395 - In Re Milton Wuzael Mathis

In Re Milton Wuzael Mathis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Penry v. Lynaugh · Reyes-Requena v. United States · Bennett v. United States · Ex Parte Briseno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'leave it for the district court to decide whether [a petitioner's] case presents the ‘rare and exceptional circumstances’ that would entitle him to the benefit of equitable tolling.’ ” In re Mathis, 483 F.3d 395, 400 (5th Cir.2007) (quoting In re Henderson, 462 F.3d at 417 ). 11 . See also Coleman v, Johnson, 184 F.3d 398, 402 (5th Cir. 1999) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Typically, a person’s IQ must be measured at 70 or below to qualify as mentally retarded.”); Clark, 457 F.3d at 445 (stating that IQ of 70 is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Flynn Effect ... has not been accepted in this Circuit as scientifically valid____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.