Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 F.3d 711 - United States v. Andrus

United States v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis

483 F.3d 711 · 2007

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
5
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Vosburgh (2010), United States v. Stabile (2011)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

260200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Matlock · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Georgia v. Randolph · United States v. Melendez-Garcia · United States v. Block

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A third party has actual authority to consent to a search if that third party has either (1) mutual use of the property by virtue of joint access, or (2) control for most purposes. Even where actual authority is lacking, however, a third party has apparent authority to consent to a search when an officer reasonably, even if erroneously, believes the third party possesses authority to consent. Whether apparent authority exists is an objective, totality-of-the-circumstances inquiry into whether the facts available to the officers at the time they commenced the search would lead a reasonable officer to believe the third party had authority to consent to the search.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A personal computer is often a repository for private information the computer's owner does not intend to share with others”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[F]jor most people, their computers are their most private spaces.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.