Miles v. Angelone’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gonzalez v. Crosby · Truax v. Corrigan · Ex parte Hull · Procup v. Strickland · Tripati v. Beaman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“good-faith basis for his continuing to pursue these matters”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zorn v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.