Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 MICH 271 - People v. Jackson

People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he entity deciding whether to require repayment must take cognizance of the individual's resources, the other demands on his own and family's finances, and the hardships he or his family will endure if repayment is required. The purpose of this inquiry is to assure repayment is not required as long as he remains indigent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the defendant remains indigent and whether repayment would cause manifest hardship”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.