Whitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
May 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kolb v. State · Gipson v. State · Baker v. State · Wilhelm v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discrepancies were clearly placed before the trier of fact. It was the jury's prerogative to weigh these facts and come to a reasonable conclusion thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hancock v. State“However, the mere possibility of tampering alone will not render the chain broken or the evidence inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hancock v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.