483 So. 2d 10 - State v. Short’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2005
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rideout v. United States · 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · State v. Gray · 453 So. 2d 1351 - SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. Resources · Trushin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Official misconduct” means the commission of the following act by a public servant, with corrupt intent to obtain a benefit for himself or herself or another or to cause unlawful harm to another: knowingly falsifying, or causing another to falsify, any official record or official document.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clement v. State“No person of common intelligence needs to guess that the terms "official record" and "official document" would include letters written on office stationary and printed office forms used in the regular course of the public's business.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defined so that those with common intelligence and understanding have sufficient warning of what actions would constitute a violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.