Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

483 So. 2d 101

483 So.2d 101

11 Fla.L.Weekly 447

Waldon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-02-13

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1991

3 state decisions

Relies on 392 So. 2d 54 - Jolly v. State · 463 So. 2d 495 - McGinty v. State · 448 So. 2d 1240 - Stinson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COWART, Judge.

¶1Relying on advice of his defense counsel as to the proper sentencing guideline scoring of his prior criminal record, the defendant entered into a plea agreement. After being sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, defendant appeals claiming that under a proper calculation, his recommended guideline sentence is less than that to which he agreed. Rather than appealing, the defendant should have moved the trial court to withdraw his plea1 or move to vacate under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Stinson v. State, 448 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). See also McGinty v. State, 463 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

¶2This appeal is dismissed without prejudice to defendant’s right to seek an appropriate remedy.

¶3DISMISSED.

COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.

¶4. Of course, if the defendant is permitted to withdraw his plea the State will be released from its agreement to nolle prosequi other charges and to recommend the sentence imposed.

/483/so2d/101 · .json · Public domain