483 So. 2d 331 - Pool v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

cited by 46 later decisions

states following

July 2018

most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 595 So. 2d 1310 - Roberson v. State (1992), 595 So. 2d 418 - Esparaza v. State (1992)

46 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murzyn v. United States · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · King v. State · 380 So. 2d 1276 - Gathright v. State · 249 So. 2d 414 - Curry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[w]here the premises upon which contraband is found is not in the exclusive possession of the accused, the accused is entitled to acquittal, absent some competent evidence connecting him with the contraband.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Jones v. State · Buggs v. State
“First to inform the officer by the warrant where the premises are, or may be found, and, second, to enable the owner to determine whether the officer has legal authority to make a search, so that resistance will not be made, or should not be made, to the search.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Hamilton v. State · 583 So. 2d 620 - Williams v. State
“Descriptions in search warrants need not be positively specific and definite, but are sufficient if the places and things to be searched are designated in such manner that the officer making the search may locate them with reasonable certainty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Hamilton v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.