State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1986
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Boykin v. Alabama · Kotteakos v. United States · 445 So. 2d 1171 - State v. Williams · 412 So. 2d 1313 - State v. Robicheaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A. Any person who, after having been convicted within this state of a felony, or who, after having been convicted under the laws of any other state or of the United States, or any foreign government or country of a crime which, if committed in this state would be a felony, thereafter commits any subsequent felony within this state, upon conviction of said felony, shall be punished as follows: "(1) If the second felony is such that upon a first conviction the offender would be punishable by imprisonment for any term less than his natural life, then the sentence to imprisonment shall be for a determinate term not less than one-third the longest term and not more than twice the longest term prescribed for a first conviction; * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“"A. Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immedical control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon. "Whoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years and for not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.