Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 SO2D 957 - State v. Green

State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 458 So. 2d 454 - State v. Martin · 483 So. 2d 953 - State v. Garcia · 480 So. 2d 263 - State v. Jackson · 295 So. 2d 792 - State v. Patterson · State v. Lynch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant contended on appeal that the state failed to show that he did not act in self-defense. The court of appeal, in rejecting this contention, stated: ‘We are referred to no rule of law placing such a burden on the prosecutor nor are we aware of any.’ This statement of the law is incorrect. It is well settled that when a defendant claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense. State v. Aldo Garcia, 483 So.2d 953 (La., Feb. 24, 1986); State v. Martin, 458 So.2d 454 (La.1984); State v. Lynch, 436 So.2d 567 (La.1983); State v. Patterson, 295 So.2d 792 (La.1974); State v. Ardoin, 128 La. 14 , 54 So. 407 (1911). Accordingly, we must vacate the judgment of the court of appeal and remand for reconsideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It should be noted that the two-year portion of defendant’s sentence imposed pursuant to La.R.S. 14:95.2 is impermissible, for defendant was not charged in the bill of information with violation of La. R.S. 14:95.2 or with use of a firearm in committing the charged offense. See State v. Jackson, 480 So.2d 263 (La.1985). Therefore, the case will have to be remanded to the district court for resentencing in the event the court of appeal affirms the conviction after remand.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.