Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 SW2D 260 - Morris v. State

Morris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Drain v. State · Alvarez v. State · Bell v. State · Beaty v. State · Holder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was obviously the legislative purpose not to permit stipulated evidence to be used in proceedings under Article 1.15, supra, unless the same was approved by the trial judge .... In the instant case, it is clear that in permitting the plea of guilty to proceed where stipulated testimony was being utilized, the trial court was of necessity giving his approval, and the entry of the written judgment approved by the court would certainly seem to satisfy the requirements of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.