Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 483 SW3D 550 - Vasquez v. State

Vasquez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Seibert · Lankston v. State · Gillenwaters v. State · Layton v. State · Carter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “let the trial court know what he wants and why he feels himself entitled to it clearly enough for the judge to understand him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unless the legal basis for the objection is obvious to the court and to opposing counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “specific words or technical considerations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.