Ex parte Flores’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits an offense if the person sends an electronic mail, instant message, text message, or similar communication that references a name, domain address, phone number, or other item of identifying information belonging to any person: (1) without obtaining the other person’s consent; (2) with the intent to cause a recipient of the communication to reasonably believe that the other person authorized or transmitted the communication; and (3)with the intent to harm or defraud any person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In general, we review a trial court's ruling on an application for writ of habeas corpus using an abuse-of-discretion standard, and we view any evidence in the light most favorable to that ruling and defer to implied factual findings supported by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Odom“The burden to establish the statute's unconstitutionality rests upon the party mounting the challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guzman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.