Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 BR 615 - In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.

In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1501 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1502 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1504 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1525 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1527 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

Relies on Butner v. United States · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Hilton v. Guyot · SCOFBP, LLC v. Central States · In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Chapter 15 was not designed to permit parties to mix and match multiple countries' laws, which would lead to haphazard, erratic or piecemeal adjudication of the distribution of assets ... as the administration and disbursement of the same assets would be handled by different tribunals in different countries according to different laws ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “comity is raised to the introductory language to make clear that it is the central concept to be addressed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.