Raymond v. Riegel Textile Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
484 F.2d 1025 · 1973
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably 77 Ill. 2d 434 - Rucker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. (1979), Porter v. American Optical Corp. (1981)
18 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1191 (COVID–19 Regulatory Relief and Work From Home Safety Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1193 · 15 U.S.C. § 1195 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1203
Relies on 9 Cal. 3d 51 - Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. · Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc. · 275 F. Supp. 373 - LaGorga v. Kroger Company · Hubbard-Hall Chemical Co. v. Silverman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“compliance with a legislative enactment ... does not prevent a finding of negligence where a reasonable man would take additional precautions”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““(1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the users or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, if a. The seller is engaged in the business of selling such a product, and b. It is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. “(2) The rule stated in sub-section (1) applies although . a. The seller has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his product, and b. The user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.