Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 F.2d 1140 - United States v. Right to Use and Occupy 3. 38 Acres of Land, More or Less

United States v. Right to Use and Occupy 3. 38 Acres of Land, More or Less’s Empirical Analysis

484 F.2d 1140 · 1973

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2018

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

7019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2662 · 10 U.S.C. § 2676

Relies on United States v. General Motors Corp. · United States v. Petty Motor Co. · United States v. Petty Motor Co. · Fairfield Steamship Corp. v. Commissioner · United States v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the entire leased premises shall be taken for any public or quasi-public use under any statute or by the right of eminent domain ... then all obligations of the Lessee under this lease shall cease and terminate as of the date on which the Lessee surrenders, or is deprived of, the physical possession and occupation of said demised premises, and the Lessee shall have the right to file and prosecute its claims against such taking authority for damages resulting from such taking.” United States v. Right to Use, Etc., Land, Alexandria, Va., supra, pág. 1143 esc. 3.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “With this type of clause, at least in the absence of a contrary state rule, the tenant has no right which persists beyond the taking and can be entitled to nothing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(A) general appropriations act provides a sufficient basis for condemnation if Congress intended the act to authorize the acquisition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.