Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 F.2d 1149 - United States v. Thevis

United States v. Thevis’s Empirical Analysis

484 F.2d 1149 · 1973

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Hamling v. United States (1974), Marks v. United States (1977)

49 federal appellate · 21 state decisions — followed in 13 states

70019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1462

Relies on Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Stanley v. Georgia · Smith v. People of the State of California · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o one is [to be] convicted under earlier extant standards if they are more restrictive of pornography than those in Miller. . . . [W]e shall consider both the Miller and Memoirs definitions of obscenity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) The dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole must appeal to a prurient interest in sex; (2) the materials must be patently offensive because they affront contemporary community standards relating to description or representation of sexual matters; (3) the material must be utterly without socially redeeming value. The Miller standard is as follows: (1) The average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the materials are patently offensive depictions or descriptions of sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable statute; (3) taken as a whole the materials must lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(a) Patently offensive representations or descriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated. “(b) Patently offensive representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, and lewd exhibition of the genitals.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.