Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 F.2d 1307 - Holtzman v. Schlesinger

Holtzman v. Schlesinger’s Empirical Analysis

484 F.2d 1307 · 1973

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 13 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Raines v. Byrd (1997), 27 Cal. 3d 793 - Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committee (1980)

34 federal appellate · 13 district · 7 state decisions

370197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Carr · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · William Marbury v. James Madison · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Greene v. McElroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the delicacies of diplomatic negotiation [and] the inevitable bargaining for the best solution of an international conflict,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on or after August 15, 1973, no funds herein or heretofore appropriated may be obligated or expended to finance directly or indirectly combat activities by United States military forces in or over or from off the shores of North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Laos, or Cambodia.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In Da Costa v. Laird, 448 F.2d 1368 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 1193 , 31 L.Ed.2d 255 (1972), this court specifically rejected the contention that the repeal by Congress of the Tonkin Gulf Resolution removed the Congressional authorization previously found sufficient in Orlando [Orlando v. Laird, 443 F.2d 1039 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 869 , 92 S.Ct. 94 , 30 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971)] .... (( “ . . . While we as men may well agonize and bewail the horror of this or any war, the sharing of Presidential and Congressional responsibility particularly at this juncture is a bluntly political and not a judicial question.” Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 484 F.2d 1307, 1309-11 (2d Cir. 1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.