Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

484 F.2d 1382

Docket No. 73-2175.

Ham v. Wainwright

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-10-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1980

3 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Tollett v. Henderson · Kimbrough v. Beto

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Barry Scott Richard, Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BELL, GODBOLD and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The decision of the District Court denying habeas relief for failure to exhaust state remedies is affirmed.1 Cf., on the merits, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973).

1

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981

/484/f2d/1382 · .json · Public domain