United States v. Dolack’s Empirical Analysis
484 F.2d 528 · 1973
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2014
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Kirby v. Illinois · Smith v. Hooey · Dickey v. Florida · Strunk v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What is before us is whether the defendant’s assertion, after indictment, of his right to counsel, notwithstanding the fact that he was then in a Canadian prison, and the denial of counsel at that time violated his Sixth Amendment rights. We hold that it did.” Id. at 530-31 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spain v. Podrebarac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.