United States v. King’s Empirical Analysis
484 F.2d 924 · 1973
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2007
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on De Simone v. United States · Kilgore v. United States · United States v. Fortunato · Batchelor v. United States · Mulloney v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was intended to include acts not covered by the words `embezzle' or `abstract' as such are used in the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`misapplication has been distinguished from”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.