Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 F.3d 1040 - Page v. Astrue

Page v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

484 F.3d 1040 · 2007

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Shannon v. Chater · Clark v. Apfel · Anderson v. Shalala · Whitehouse v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The sequential evaluation process may be terminated at step two only when the claimant's impairment or combination of impairments would have no more than a minimal impact on [his or] her ability to work.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “properly assume that the expert framed his answers based on the factors the ALJ told him to take into account.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`based on all the relevant evidence, including medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and [claimant's] own description of her limitations.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.