Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 F.3d 644 - Eichorn

Eichorn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Evert Thompson (2010), Rivera-Mercado v. General Motors Corp. (2009)

4 district · 1 state decisions

220200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · Varity Corporation v. Howe · Mertens v. Hewitt Associates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As [appellees in the previous appeal], [defendants] were not required to raise all possible alternative grounds for affirmance to avoid waiving those grounds.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““Almost invariably ... suits seeking (whether by judgment, injunction, or declaration) to compel the defendant to pay a sum of money to the plaintiff are suits for ‘money damages,’ as that phrase has traditionally been applied, since they seek no more than compensation for loss resulting from the defendant’s breach of a legal duty. And money damages are, of course, the classic form of legal relief.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation. The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at reasonable time and place. The court may order that they be produced in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.