Bader v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 6 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a person [who] has valid custody rights to a child under the law of the country of the child’s habitual residence ... cannot fail to “exercise” those custody rights under the Hague Convention short of acts that constitute clear and unequivocal abandonment of the child.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. East Sussex Children Services v. Morris · 762 F. Supp. 2d 1363 - Seaman v. Peterson

2. “exercise” whenever a parent with de jure custody rights keeps, or seeks to keep, any sort of regular contact with his or her child.' ” (quoting Friedrich II, 78 F.3d 1060 , 1065 (6th Cir.1996))). 23 . England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 , 272 (5th Cir.2000) (quoting Convention art. 13(b)). 24 . See id. at 272 ; see also id. at 272 n. 5 (noting that the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rodriguez v. Yanez

3. “1) that return would expose the child to a “grave risk” of “physical or psychological harm or otherwise place [the child] in an intolerable situation” and (2) that return of the child would not be permitted by “fundamental principles of the United States relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Cunningham v. Cunningham