Young v. ATO, INC.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Prudential Ins Co of America v. Cheek · Campbell v. Sheraton Corp. of America · Brookfield v. Drury College · Want v. Century Supply Company · Frostwood Drugs, Inc. v. Fischer & Frichtel Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Count I argues that the Missouri Service Letter Statute, § 290.140 R.S.Mo. 1969, is unconstitutional. Defendant’s ar guments in this regard have been rejected by the Supreme Courts of both Missouri and the United States, and this Court is not now disposed to overrule those bodies. Cheek v. Prudential Insurance Company, 192 S.W. 387 (Mo.1917); Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Cheek, 259 U.S. 530 , 42 S.Ct. 516 , 66 L.Ed. 1044 (1922). Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Count I will therefore be denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No action shall be brought . .. upon any agreement that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement upon which the action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person by him thereto lawfully authorized ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.