484 F. Supp. 2d 1202 - Lebow v. Meredith Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 215 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Tenth Circuit has not decided the issue of whether compensatory damages for emotional distress are available on an ADEA retaliation claim.” Lebow v. Meredith Corp., 484 F.Supp.2d 1202 , 1219 n. 6 (D.Kan.2007). In Villescas v. Abraham, the Tenth Circuit stated that it expressed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.