Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 NW2D 167 - State v. Geier

State v. Geier’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2017

17 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vermont v. Cox · Hanil Bank v. Michelman · State v. Wright · State v. Evans · State v. Droste

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Two or more indictable public offenses which arise from the same transaction or occurrence or from two or more transactions or occurrences constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, when alleged and prosecuted contemporaneously, shall be alleged and prosecuted as separate counts in a single complaint, information or indictment, unless, for good cause shown, the trial court in its discretion determines otherwise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny instrument or device designed primarily for use in inflicting death or injury upon a human being or animal, and which is capable of inflicting death upon a human being when used in the manner for which it was designed, except a bow and arrow when possessed and used for hunting or any other lawful purpose. Additionally, any instrument or device of any sort whatsoever which is actually used in .such a manner as to indicate that the defendant intends to inflict death or serious injury upon the other, and which, when so used, is capable of inflicting death upon a human being, is a dangerous weapon. Dangerous weapons include but are not limited to any offensive weapon, pistol, revolver, or other, firearm, dagger, razor, stiletto, switchblade knife, knife having a blade excéed-ing five inches in length, or any portable device or weapon directing an electric current, impulse, wave, or beam1 that produces a high-voltage pulse designed to immobilize a person. :”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]s a general matter, “[t]he grounds of a motion for new trial must stand or fall on exceptions taken'at-trial and a party cannot in' a post verdict motion amplify or add new grounds as a basis for relief.” However; we need not rest our resolution of this issue on the principles of error preservation insofar as we conclude that Geier’s argument fails on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.