Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 P2D 900 - Lawson v. State

Lawson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2017

12 state decisions

6019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 11 Okla. Crim. 103 - Estep v. State · Shackelford v. State · Privitt v. State · Lawson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant convicted of robbery by firearms cannot be additionally convicted and sentenced for possession of the narcotics taken in that robbery where the evidence shows there was but one criminal act which incidentally violated more than one statute.” 481 P.2d at 164 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]he Statutes prevent multiple punishment, under different sections of the Statues, for several crimes committed during one criminal transaction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Consequently, the determinative question in this appeal is: Were defendant’s criminal acts one transaction ? There can be no argument with the fact that defendant’s act were set on foot for the single purpose of committing the act of burglary. In the fulfillment of that purpose, he also committed the crime of Armed Robbery, in an unintermittent manner.” (Emphasis Ours)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.