IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FREDERICK VONSEYDEWITZ, No. 82657
Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA
BOARD OF PRISON
COMMISSIONERS; BRIAN
SANDOVAL; ADAM P. LAXALT; ROSS FILE
MILLER; CATHERINE CORTEZ
MASTO; THE STATE OF NEVADA APR 0 a 2021
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 6C,URT
JAMES GREG COX; HOWARD
SKOLNIK; NEVADA PAROLE BOARD;
CONNIE S. BISBEE; THE STATE OF
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY; AND JAMES WRIGHT,
Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court "Order
Granting Summary Judgment pursuant to Defendants Renewed Motion to
Dismiss decided in this action on March 9, 2021." Eighth Judicial District
Court, Clark County; Jessica K. Peterson, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. No
order granting summary judgment appears on the district court docket
sheet. Although it appears that a motion to dismiss was orally granted on
March 9, 2021, that oral order is not appealable. See State, Div. of Child
and Family Serv's v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,
(2004) C[IDlispositional court orders that are not administrative
in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
I947A .1130.
2_ 1 -fo l OO
controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become
effective"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and
0 RD E RS this appeal DISMISSED.'
Parraguirre
oiectic,.0 , J. , J.
Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge
Frederick Vonseydewitz
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
1 1 f aggrieved, appellant rnay file a new notice of appeal once the
district court enters a written order ruling on the motion to dismiss.
2
