Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 So. 2d 1239 - Harich v. State

484 So. 2d 1239 - Harich v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State (2000), 627 So. 2d 1170 - Anderson v. State (1993)

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

2501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Griffin v. Texas · Demps v. State · LeDuc v. State · 437 So. 2d 1082 - Harich v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trial counsel's conduct was [not] outside the range of professionally competent assistance, given the evidence presented in this case, which included Harich's testimony that he left the victim alive at a convenience store.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Harich v. Wainwright
  2. “Because an evidentiary hearing has not been held on the ineffective assistance of counsel claims, we must treat [appellant's] allegations as true except to the extent that they are conclusively rebutted by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 987 So. 2d 184 - Bristol v. State
  3. “Under rule 3.850 procedure, a movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing unless the motion and record conclusively show that the movant is not entitled to relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Jones v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.