Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 SO2D 1284 - Hutson v. Casey

Hutson v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2014

8 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 367 So. 2d 201 - FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N v. Webb · 463 So. 2d 328 - Neubauer v. Soper · 469 So. 2d 244 - Fresh Start, Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The agency may accept the recommended penalty in a recommended order, but may not reduce or increase it without a review of the complete record and without stating with particularity its reasons therefor in the order, by citing to the record and justifying the action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth several acts of immorality and misconduct in office. Such actions are, by statute, grounds for dismissal and such is the appropriate penalty in this instance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to provide some assurance that the agency has gone through a thoughtful process of review and consideration before making a determination to change the recommended penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.