484 So. 2d 1299 - Tucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
March 1994
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 So. 2d 830 - Florida Bar v. Imand · 353 So. 2d 640 - Pouncy v. State · 409 So. 2d 1111 - Hamilton v. Hamilton Steel Corp. · United States v. Miller · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that where an expert is hired solely to assist the defense and will not be called as a witness, the state may not depose the expert or call him as a witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“once communications protected by the attorney-client privilege are voluntarily disclosed, the privilege is waived and cannot be reclaimed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perez v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.