Nolan v. Attwood’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · Canter v. Koehring Company · Rourke v. Cloud · 338 So. 2d 314 - Montgomery v. Breaux · Langhans v. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... any response[s] by the defendant which raises new matter which `assuming the allegations of the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action which will have the effect of defeating the plaintiff's suit on the merits.' Langhans v. Hale, 345 So.2d 1226 (La.App. 1st Cir.1977), Modicut v. Bremer, 398 So.2d 570 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980), and Rourke v. Cloud, 398 So.2d 57 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1981).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.