Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 484 SO2D 444 - Willis v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.

Willis v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2012

8 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 360 So. 2d 708 - Martin v. Tapley · Coggin v. Starke Bros. Realty Co., Inc. · 361 So. 2d 113 - Mathis v. Jim Skinner Ford, Inc. · 443 So. 2d 924 - Johnson v. Gary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he propriety of granting motions for summary judgment must be tested by reviewing what the trial court had before it when it granted the motion.' Mathis v. Jim Skinner Ford, Inc. , 361 So.2d 113 , 116 (Ala. 1978). On a motion for rehearing, the plaintiff must show circumstances which prevented his presenting evidence to counter that offered in support of the summary judgment. Mathis, supra.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Only when Willis filed the motion to reconsider did he attempt to develop this issue by offering a supporting affidavit. However, in his motion to reconsider, Willis failed to show any circumstances which prevented his offering this evidence earlier to counter that offered in support of summary judgment. The trial court properly refused to set aside summary judgment on this issue."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.