Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

484 So. 2d 653

484 So.2d 653

11 Fla.L.Weekly 678

Scott v. Scott

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-03-19

Decided 1986-03-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1We are affirming the order being appealed as we interpret it as having considered only two specific matters; namely, a writ of garnishment for past, not future payments, and an issue of jurisdiction of the person, not of the subject matter. We do not decide any issue of the applicability of garnishment for future alimony nor the right to modification.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
/484/so2d/653 · .json · Public domain